Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

OBJECTIVE: This was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared. METHODS: We first screened patients without underlying disease and no history of fractures who underwent lumbar MRI in our center in the past four years. Over the span of 10 years, 200 patients (100 males and 100 females) were randomly recruited into each cohort to undergo 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans. Subsequently, we tabulated the number of patients admitted to our hospital with OVCF over the past four years. There were 30 healthy adults under 4 times of MRI scans in different parameters to determine the differentiation of VBQ. The 30 healthy adults were recruited to validate the differentiation of VBQ under various parameters. RESULTS: A total of 2400 patients without OVCF and 405 patients with OVCF were enrolled. The VBQ value of 1.5 T was significantly higher compared with that of 3.0 T (2.769 ± 0.494 > 2.199 ± 0.432, P < 0.0001). VBQ of 43.31 kHz in 1.5 T was significantly lower than that of 35.36 kHz (2.447 ± 0.350 < 2.632 ± 0.280, P < 0.05). The differentiation of VBQ in 1.5 T and 3.0 T was validated using results of healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ is an effective tool for differentiating patients with OVCF and can be used as a primary screening tool for osteoporosis. However, VBQ is significantly affected by magnetic field intensity and bandwidth and cannot achieve its universality as it originally proposed.

Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common presentation across different healthcare settings. Clinicians need to confidently be able to screen and identify people presenting with low back pain with a high suspicion of serious or specific pathology (e.g. vertebral fracture). Patients identified with an increased likelihood of having a serious pathology will likely require additional investigations and specific treatment. Guidelines recommend a thorough history and clinical assessment to screen for serious pathology as a cause of low back pain. However, the diagnostic accuracy of recommended red flags (e.g. older age, trauma, corticosteroid use) remains unclear, particularly those used to screen for vertebral fracture. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of red flags used to screen for vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain. Where possible, we reported results of red flags separately for different types of vertebral fracture (i.e. acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, vertebral traumatic fracture, vertebral stress fracture, unspecified vertebral fracture). SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 26 July 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered primary diagnostic studies if they compared results of history taking or physical examination (or both) findings (index test) with a reference standard test (e.g. X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), single-photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT)) for the identification of vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain. We included index tests that were presented individually or as part of a combination of tests. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data for diagnostic two-by-two tables from the publications or reconstructed them using information from relevant parameters to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive (+LR) and negative (-LR) likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We extracted aspects of study design, characteristics of the population, index test, reference standard, and type of vertebral fracture. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of studies and index tests, therefore the analysis was descriptive. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and LRs for each test and used these as an indication of clinical usefulness. Two review authors independently conducted risk of bias and applicability assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. MAIN RESULTS: This review is an update of a previous Cochrane Review of red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in people with low back pain. We included 14 studies in this review, six based in primary care, five in secondary care, and three in tertiary care. Four studies reported on 'osteoporotic vertebral fractures', two studies reported on 'vertebral compression fracture', one study reported on 'osteoporotic and traumatic vertebral fracture', two studies reported on 'vertebral stress fracture', and five studies reported on 'unspecified vertebral fracture'. Risk of bias was only rated as low in one study for the domains reference standard and flow and timing. The domain patient selection had three studies and the domain index test had six studies rated at low risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of the data. Results from single studies suggest only a small number of the red flags investigated may be informative. In the primary healthcare setting, results from single studies suggest 'trauma' demonstrated informative +LRs (range: 1.93 to 12.85) for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' and 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' (+LR: 6.42, 95% CI 2.94 to 14.02). Results from single studies suggest 'older age' demonstrated informative +LRs for studies in primary care for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' (older age greater than 70 years: 11.19, 95% CI 5.33 to 23.51). Results from single studies suggest 'corticosteroid use' may be an informative red flag in primary care for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' (+LR range: 3.97, 95% CI 0.20 to 79.15 to 48.50, 95% CI 11.48 to 204.98) and 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' (+LR: 2.46, 95% CI 1.13 to 5.34); however, diagnostic values varied and CIs were imprecise. Results from a single study suggest red flags as part of a combination of index tests such as 'older age and female gender' in primary care demonstrated informative +LRs for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' (16.17, 95% CI 4.47 to 58.43). In the secondary healthcare setting, results from a single study suggest 'trauma' demonstrated informative +LRs for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' (+LR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.54) and 'older age' demonstrated informative +LRs for 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' (older age greater than 75 years: 2.51, 95% CI 1.48 to 4.27). Results from a single study suggest red flags as part of a combination of index tests such as 'older age and trauma' in secondary care demonstrated informative +LRs for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' (+LR: 4.35, 95% CI 2.92 to 6.48). Results from a single study suggest when '4 of 5 tests' were positive in secondary care, they demonstrated informative +LRs for 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' (+LR: 9.62, 95% CI 5.88 to 15.73). In the tertiary care setting, results from a single study suggest 'presence of contusion/abrasion' was informative for 'vertebral compression fracture' (+LR: 31.09, 95% CI 18.25 to 52.96). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that only a few red flags are potentially useful in guiding clinical decisions to further investigate people suspected to have a vertebral fracture. Most red flags were not useful as screening tools to identify vertebral fracture in people with low back pain. In primary care, 'older age' was informative for 'unspecified vertebral fracture', and 'trauma' and 'corticosteroid use' were both informative for 'unspecified vertebral fracture' and 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture'. In secondary care, 'older age' was informative for 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' and 'trauma' was informative for 'unspecified vertebral fracture'. In tertiary care, 'presence of contusion/abrasion' was informative for 'vertebral compression fracture'. Combinations of red flags were also informative and may be more useful than individual tests alone. Unfortunately, the challenge to provide clear guidance on which red flags should be used routinely in clinical practice remains. Further research with primary studies is needed to improve and consolidate our current recommendations for screening for vertebral fractures to guide clinical care.

Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment.

OBJECTIVE: To test the diagnostic performance of a deep-learning Two-Stream Compare and Contrast Network (TSCCN) model for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) based on MRI. METHODS: We tested a deep-learning system in 123 benign and 86 malignant VCFs. The median sagittal T1-weighted images (T1WI), T2-weighted images with fat suppression (T2WI-FS), and a combination of both (thereafter, T1WI/T2WI-FS) were used to validate TSCCN. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed to evaluate the performance of TSCCN. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of TSCCN in differentiating benign and malignant VCFs were calculated and compared with radiologists' assessments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were tested to find intra- and inter-observer agreement of radiologists in differentiating malignant from benign VCFs. RESULTS: The AUC of the ROC plots of TSCCN according to T1WI, T2WI-FS, and T1WI/T2WI-FS images were 99.2%, 91.7%, and 98.2%, respectively. The accuracy of T1W, T2WI-FS, and T1W/T2WI-FS based on TSCCN was 95.2%, 90.4%, and 96.2%, respectively, greater than that achieved by radiologists. Further, the specificity of T1W, T2WI-FS, and T1W/T2WI-FS based on TSCCN was higher at 98.4%, 94.3%, and 99.2% than that achieved by radiologists. The intra- and inter-observer agreements of radiologists were 0.79-0.85 and 0.79-0.80 for T1WI, 0.65-0.72 and 0.70-0.74 for T2WI-FS, and 0.83-0.88 and 0.83-0.84 for T1WI/T2WI-FS. CONCLUSION: The TSCCN model showed better diagnostic performance than radiologists for automatically identifying benign or malignant VCFs, and is a potentially helpful tool for future clinical application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: TSCCN-assisted MRI has shown superior performance in distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures compared to radiologists. This technology has the value to enhance diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Further integration into clinical practice is required to optimize patient management. KEY POINTS: • The Two-Stream Compare and Contrast Network (TSCCN) model showed better diagnostic performance than radiologists for identifying benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures. • The processing of TSCCN is fast and stable, better than the subjective evaluation by radiologists in diagnosing vertebral compression fractures. • The TSCCN model provides options for developing a fully automated, streamlined artificial intelligence diagnostic tool.

Differentiation of benign versus malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures by different machine learning with MRI-based radiomic features.

OBJECTIVES: To explore an optimal machine learning (ML) model trained on MRI-based radiomic features to differentiate benign from malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients within 6 weeks of back pain (non-traumatic) who underwent MRI and were diagnosed with benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs. The two cohorts were retrospectively recruited from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (QUH) and Qinghai Red Cross Hospital (QRCH). Three hundred seventy-six participants from QUH were divided into the training (n = 263) and validation (n = 113) cohort based on the date of MRI examination. One hundred three participants from QRCH were used to evaluate the external generalizability of our prediction models. A total of 1045 radiomic features were extracted from each region of interest (ROI) and used to establish the models. The prediction models were established based on 7 different classifiers. RESULTS: These models showed favorable efficacy in differentiating benign from malignant indistinguishable VCFs. However, our Gaussian naïve Bayes (GNB) model attained higher AUC and accuracy (0.86, 87.61%) than the other classifiers in validation cohort. It also remains the high accuracy and sensitivity for the external test cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our GNB model performed better than the other models in the present study, suggesting that it may be more useful for differentiating indistinguishable benign form malignant VCFs. KEY POINTS: • The differential diagnosis of benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs based on MRI is rather difficult for spine surgeons or radiologists. • Our ML models facilitate the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant indistinguishable VCFs with improved diagnostic efficacy. • Our GNB model had the high accuracy and sensitivity for clinical application.

Circulating miR-107 as a diagnostic biomarker of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture increases bone formation in vitro and in vivo.

AIMS: This study aimed to examine the key circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in the plasma of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and assess their potential role as diagnostic biomarkers and explore their function in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was applied to identify hub miRNAs for subsequent analysis. The candidate miRNAs were tested using plasma from 144 patients and the results were applied to construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess their diagnostic value. In addition, the function of the target miRNA was validated in MC3T3-E1 cells, human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), and an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model. KEY FINDINGS: Seven modules were obtained by WGCNA analysis. The expression levels of circulating miR-107 in the red module were significantly lower in osteoporotic patients than in healthy controls. In addition, miR-107 provided discrimination with an AUC > 85 % by ROC analyses to differentiate women osteoporosis patients from healthy controls and differentiate women osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures from osteoporotic patients without vertebral compression fractures. In vitro experiments revealed that miR-107 levels were increased in osteogenically induced MC3T3-E1 cells and BMSCs and transfection with synthetic miR-107 could promote bone formation. Lastly, the bone parameters were improved by miR-107 upregulation in OVX mice. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings show that circulating miR-107 plays an essential role in facilitating osteogenesis and may be a useful diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target in osteoporosis.

[Osteoporotic vertebral fractures-From diagnosis to treatment]. / Osteoporotische Wirbelkörperfrakturen ­ Von der Diagnose zur Therapie.

The aim of the present work is an overview of current concepts in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, risk factors, clinical presentation and conservative and operative management. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a widespread problem, affecting between 700,000 and 1.5 million adults annually in the USA alone. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can cause severe physical impairment, including back pain, dysfunction, and progressive thoracic kyphosis. Mortality after osteoporotic vertebral fractures is still increased compared to age-matched controls. In the reality of care, advocates of purely conservative therapy as well as advocates of surgical treatment can be found all over the world. In summary, understanding the risk factors, appropriate clinical evaluation and treatment strategies are crucial. When surgery is indicated, balloon kyphoplasty shows significantly better pain reduction and lower mortality compared to nonsurgical treatment.

Effects of transitional care based on the social support theory for older patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A quasi-experimental trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effects of transitional care (TC) programs on the health outcomes of discharged older patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). METHODS: A total of 160 older patients were recruited from two campuses of a public teaching hospital in China. Patients were grouped according to the campus to which they were admitted. The TC programs commenced one day before discharge and lasted 6 months after discharge. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyse the effects of the TC programs. RESULTS: The TC programs improved the discharge of older patients with OVCF in their activities of daily living (ADLs), pain levels and social support, and decreased fracture recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of concurrent clinical improvements and health outcomes in discharged older patients with OVCFs from the effects of TC programs based on social support theory.

Unexplained Abdominal Pain Caused by Fracture of the Thoracic Vertebra.

BACKGROUND It is important to identify the cause of chronic abdominal pain, especially in older adults. Thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures are one potential cause, and can be difficult to identify. We report a case of an older man with severe unexplained abdominal pain and nausea due to an inadequately treated thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture. CASE REPORT A 93-year-old man fell 89 days prior to visiting the hospital and was diagnosed with a compression fracture in the Th12 vertebra. He started wearing a corset on the day of the injury. Two days later, he developed abdominal pain, mild nausea, and a decreased appetite. He attributed the symptoms to wearing the corset; therefore, he stopped wearing it. The cause of his abdominal symptoms could not be determined by blood tests and computed tomography of the abdomen. A 45° upper body elevation induced marked right lower abdominal pain (consistent with the dominant region of Th12-L1), and decreased temperature sensation was observed in the same region. We concluded that the abdominal pain was caused by neuropathy owing to a ruptured Th12 vertebral fracture. The patient was treated conservatively, the abdominal pain and nausea resolved 7 weeks after admission, and the patient was discharged. CONCLUSIONS When assessing patients with unexplained abdominal pain, vertebral compression fractures should be included in the differential diagnosis and the necessary diagnostic assessments should be made as early as possible. Early diagnosis provides a wider range of treatment options and can contribute to minimizing functional decline.

Management of Osteoporosis and Spinal Fractures: Contemporary Guidelines and Evolving Paradigms.

Physicians involved in treating spine fractures secondary to osteopenia and osteoporosis should know the pathogenesis and current guidelines on managing the underlying diminished bone mineral density, as worldwide fracture prevention campaigns are trailing behind in meeting their goals. This is a narrative review exploring the various imaging and laboratory tests used to diagnose osteoporotic fractures and a comprehensive compilation of contemporary medical and surgical management. We have incorporated salient recommendations from the Endocrine Society, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE), and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). The use of modern scoring systems such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) for evaluating fracture risk in osteoporosis with a 10-year probability of hip fracture and major fractures in the spine, forearm, hip, or shoulder is highlighted. This osteoporosis risk assessment tool can be easily incorporated into the preoperative bone health optimization strategies, especially before elective spine surgery in osteoporotic patients. The role of primary surgical intervention for vertebral compression fracture and secondary fracture prevention with pharmacological therapy is described, with randomized clinical trial-based wisdom on its timing and dosage, drug holiday, adverse effects, and relevant evidence-based literature. We also aim to present an evidence-based clinical management algorithm for treating osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures, tumor-induced osteoporosis, or hardware stabilization in elderly trauma patients in the setting of their impaired bone health. The recent guidelines and recommendations on surgical intervention by various medical societies are covered, along with outcome studies that reveal the efficacy of cement augmentation of vertebral compression fractures via vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty versus conservative medical management in the elderly population.

A Rare Presentation of a Compression Fracture or a Typical Presentation of Lateral Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Diagnostic Error?

A 78-year-old woman complained of severe pain in the left costal region. Her body mass index was 23.1 kg/m2. Lateral cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (LACNES) was the suspected diagnosis because the affected area was 2×2 cm and positive for pinch sign. Seventeen days later, the patient again presented with complaints of lower back pain accompanied by back pain upon extending the spine. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine showed a fracture of the vertebral body of T11. We herein discuss our errors in the diagnostic process and critical tactics for avoiding such errors in the future.

A patient with Turner syndrome received the percutaneous vertebroplasty seven times: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Turner syndrome (TS) is characterized as the complete or partial absence of one X chromosome and is an extremely rare disease affecting approximately 1:2500 live female births. Though the prevalence of osteoporosis among women with TS is estimated to be around 55-64% and they suffer more frequently from fractures than normal, few reports concerning TS patients with osteoporosis are able to be seen due to tiny number of patients. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a rare case of TS with osteoporosis, who has undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) seven times because of several vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). G-banded karyotype analysis was performed and the result was 45,X[43]/47,XXX[17], indicating that the patient was a mosaicism of TS karyotype and Trisomy X syndrome karyotype. TS is the underlying cause of low level of estrogen for this patient. The interaction of aging, estrogen deficiency and intestinal dysbacteriosis leads to her severe osteoporosis and multi-segmental VCFs. The aim of this report is to provide recommendations regarding the management of TS patients with osteoporosis by reviewing the clinical presentation of TS, the influence of estrogen deficiency in osteoporosis, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and hormone replacement treatment are essential for TS patients to prevent osteoporosis and reduce the risk of fractures. This is a rare case report describing TS patient with severe osteoporosis and VCFs.

A deep learning algorithm for automated measurement of vertebral body compression from X-ray images.

The vertebral compression is a significant factor for determining the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and is generally measured manually by specialists. The consequent misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can be fatal for patients. In this study, we trained and evaluated the performance of a vertebral body segmentation model and a vertebral compression measurement model based on convolutional neural networks. For vertebral body segmentation, we used a recurrent residual U-Net model, with an average sensitivity of 0.934 (± 0.086), an average specificity of 0.997 (± 0.002), an average accuracy of 0.987 (± 0.005), and an average dice similarity coefficient of 0.923 (± 0.073). We then generated 1134 data points on the images of three vertebral bodies by labeling each segment of the segmented vertebral body. These were used in the vertebral compression measurement model based on linear regression and multi-scale residual dilated blocks. The model yielded an average mean absolute error of 2.637 (± 1.872) (%), an average mean square error of 13.985 (± 24.107) (%), and an average root mean square error of 3.739 (± 2.187) (%) in fractured vertebral body data. The proposed algorithm has significant potential for aiding the diagnosis of vertebral compression fractures.

A novel vertebroplasty technique using a larger-diameter needle for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

ABSTRACT: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) are well-established minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). However, some drawbacks have been reported regarding these procedures, including height loss, cement leakage, and loss of the restored height after balloon deflation. We performed a novel VP technique to minimize these limitations of conventional procedures. This study aimed to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of our method using a larger-diameter needle versus conventional VP (using a smaller needle) for thoracolumbar OVCF.From April 2016 to May 2017, 107 consecutive patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar OVCF were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 underwent conventional VP, i.e., using a smaller diameter needle, and group 2 underwent VP through a modified method with a larger-diameter needle. For radiological evaluation, parameters related to anterior vertebral height (AVH) and segmental angle were assessed using plain standing radiographs, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale. Cement injection amount and leakage pattern were also analyzed. Group 2 showed a larger anterior vertebral height change than group 1 immediately postoperatively and one year postoperatively. The 1-year postoperatively-AVH maintained better in group 2 than in group 1. Group 2 showed more significant improvement of segmental angle immediately postoperatively than group 1 (3.15° in group 1 vs 9.36° in group 2). IYPo-visual analog scale significantly improved in both groups, with greater improvement in group 2 (3.69 in group 1 vs 5.63 in group 2). A substantially larger amount of cement was injected, with a lower leakage rate in group 2 than in group 1.A novel VP technique using a larger-diameter needle showed superior radiological and clinical outcomes than conventional VP. Therefore, it can be considered a useful treatment option for OVCF.

Utility of vertebral biopsy before vertebroplasty in patients with diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the utility of a biopsy performed just before vertebroplasty in patients with diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and no history of neoplastic or hematologic diseases. BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is the most frequent cause of vertebral compression fracture, with trauma and pathologic vertebral weakening being other common causes. Since secondary fractures at imaging investigation can present as simple compression fractures, it is important to identify an underlying pathology. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the frequency of unexpected positive histology in vertebral samples withdrawn from patients undergoing a vertebroplasty to evaluate if a vertebral biopsy can routinely be used in case of VCF and when a secondary cause is not suspected. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the results of 324 biopsies performed from February 2003 to March 2019 just before vertebroplasty in 1183 patients diagnosed with one or more vertebral compression fractures and with no history of neoplastic or hematological diseases and with no suspicious findings for secondary fractures at imaging. RESULTS: Biopsy was not diagnostic in 9/324 cases (2.8%); osteoporosis was the diagnosis in 295 cases (91%); in the remaining 20 cases (6.2%), histology was positive for an underlying pathology: 12/20 (60% of positive cases) multiple myeloma; 5/20 (25%) lymphoma/leukemia; 1/20 (5%) spondylitis; 1/20 (5%) metastasis; 1/20 (5%) hemangioma. A significantly higher incidence of positive biopsies was found in patients younger than 73 (p = 0.01) with 17 of 20 (85%) positive biopsies. No complications related to the bioptic maneuver were found, according to CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral biopsy is a safe procedure with no related complications. In our series, an unexpected diagnosis was found in 6% of cases with impact on patient's clinical management. Positive unexpected histology was significantly higher in younger patients. In conclusion, we believe that a biopsy is useful and should be performed on all patients with vertebral compression fractures before a vertebroplasty.

Accuracy and precision of the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for predicting vertebral compression fractures after radiotherapy in spinal metastases: a meta-analysis.

Radiotherapy has played an important role in the treatment of spinal metastases. One of the major complications of radiotherapy is vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Although the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) was developed for evaluating spinal instability in patients with spinal metastases, it is also commonly used to predict VCF after radiotherapy in patients with spinal metastases. However, its accuracy for predicting radiotherapy-induced VCF and precision remain controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the diagnostic value of the SINS to predict radiotherapy-induced VCF and to make recommendations for improving its diagnostic power. We searched core databases and identified 246 studies. Fourteen studies were analyzed, including 7 studies (with 1269 segments) for accuracy and 7 studies (with 280 patients) for precision. For accuracy, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.776. When a SINS cut-off value of 7 was used, as was done in the included studies, the pooled sensitivity was 0.790 and the pooled specificity was 0.546. For precision, the summary estimate of interobserver agreement was the highest dividing 2 categories based on a cut-off value of 7, and the value was 0.788. The body collapse showed moderate relationship and precision with the VCF. The lytic tumor of bone lesion showed high accuracy and fair reliability, while location had excellent reliability, but low accuracy. The SINS system can be used to predict the occurrence of VCF after radiotherapy in spinal metastases with moderate accuracy and substantial reliability. Increasing the cut-off value and revising the domains may improve the diagnostic performance to predict the VCF of the SINS.

A novel assessment of abdominal pseudohernia after thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures using surface electromyography and ultrasonography: A case report.

RATIONALE: An abdominal pseudohernia is a protrusion of the abdominal wall that there is no actual muscular disruption. This report presents a case in which abdominal muscle activities were accurately and quantitatively measured using ultrasonography (US) and surface electromyography in a patient with abdominal pseudohernia. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 62-year-old man presented with a marked protrusion on the left abdomen with increasing abdominal pressure. DIAGNOSES: First, the thickness of the abdominal muscle was measured with US while the patient constantly blew the positive expiratory pressure device. When the force was applied to the abdomen, the mean thickness of the muscle layer on the lesion site was found to be thinner. Second, the activities of the abdominal muscles were measured using surface electromyography by attaching electrodes to 8 channels at the same time. When the same pressure was applied on both sides of the abdomen, more recruitment occurred to compensate for muscle weakness at the lesion site. Through the previous 2 tests, the decrease in muscle activity in the lesion area could be quantitatively evaluated. Third, the denervation of the muscle was confirmed using US-guided needle electromyography. INTERVENTIONS: The patient in this case was wearing an abdominal binder. In addition, he had been training his abdominal muscles through McGill exercise and breathing exercises such as with a positive expiratory pressure device. OUTCOMES: The patient was able to understand his symptoms. A follow-up test will be performed to see if there is any improvement. LESSONS: By using these outstanding assessment methods, proper diagnosis and rehabilitation treatment strategies can be developed.

Percutaneous Transpedicular Fixation by PEEK Polymer Implants Combined with Cementoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transpedicular fixation by PEEK polymer implants and cementoplasty for vertebral compression fracture (VCF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2019 to December 2019, 6 consecutive patients (3 men and 3 women; mean age 55 ± 8 years; range 40-64 years) who had percutaneous transpedicular fixation with cementoplasty for the treatment of VCF (5 tumor lesions, 1 traumatic) were included. The procedure duration, length of hospital stay, and complications were reported. Visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for pain and disability were assessed before and 2 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean procedure duration was 74 ± 47 min (range 20-140 min). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-63) after the procedure. Only minor adverse events were reported (4 asymptomatic cement leakages) but no severe complications. No cases of procedural site fracture during follow-up were noted (median 198 days; range 78-238 days). The mean VAS score decreased from 6.2 ± 1.8 mm (median 6 mm; range 4-9 mm) before the procedure to 1.7 ± 2.1 mm (median 1; range 0-5 mm) after the procedure. The ODI decreased from 36 ± 14% (range 18-54%) before the procedure to 23 ± 10% (range 11-30%) at 2-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transpedicular fixation of VCF by PEEK implants with cementoplasty appears feasible and safe.

Vertebral compression fractures: Still an unpredictable aspect of osteoporosis

Vertebral compression fracture is a hallmark of osteoporosis (OP) and by far the most prevalent fragility fracture. It is well proven that patients who develop a vertebral compression fracture are at substantial risk for additional fractures. Diagnosis is based on adequate clinical evaluation, imaging, and laboratory tests. The imaging of OP and fragility fractures includes conventional radiology to evaluate spinal fractures, bone mineral density (BMD) testing by dual energy x-ray densitometry, quantitative computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy (if necessary), and ultrasound. Screening and treatment of individuals with high risk of osteoporotic fracture are cost-effective, but approximately two-thirds of the vertebral compression fractures (VCF) that occur each year are not accurately diagnosed and, therefore, not treated. Evaluation of VCFs, even though they may be asymptomatic, seems essential to health-related and/or clinical research on OP.

Risk Factors for Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: An Analysis of 1456 Vertebrae Augmented by Low-Viscosity Bone Cement.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) using low-viscosity bone cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cement leakage is the most common complication for PVP and its risk factors have been discussed. However, data in previous series were heterogeneous. Additionally, relative smaller patient sample or more types of cement leakage classified in those studies made the results conflicting. METHODS: A total of 1090 patients who underwent PVP with low-viscosity bone cement for OVCFs in 1456 levels between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters potentially affecting the occurrence of cement leakage were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Cement leakage was assessed using postoperative computed tomography scanning, and classified into two types (cortical leakage and venous leakage) considering the mechanism. RESULTS: The incidence of cortical and venous leakage were 20.3% (295/1456) and 56.2% (819/1456), respectively. Cortical disruption, basivertebral foramen were the strongest risk factors for cortical leakage (P = 0.000), venous leakage (P = 0.000), respectively. Greater cement volume is one risk factor for both cortical leakage and venous leakage. The intravertebral cleft, solid type of cement distribution were significant risk factors for cortical leakage, and they both were protective factors for venous leakage. For cortical leakage, older age and trauma were another two risk factors. For venous leakage, female was another one risk factor, and higher grade of fracture severity is the strongest protective factor. CONCLUSION: Both cortical leakage and venous leakage are prevalent. Adequate known of risk factors could help balance the incidence of two type leakage in unique vertebra and reduce the incidence of leakage in general in PVP for OVCFs.Level of Evidence: 3.